
While Aureomycin®
(chlortetracycline) is primarily seen as an excellent in-feed antibiotic for bovine respiratory disease, studies show it can also provide an excellent return on investment in terms of improved weight gain and feed efficiency.
For example, in one trial, highly stressed calves fed Aureomycin showed better average daily gain (2.51 vs. 2.30) and feed conversion (12.76 vs. 12.85) than untreated calves.
Bovatec® (lasalocid) also improves weight gain and feed efficiency.
In 12 studies in cattle on high-fiber diets, cattle treated with Bovatec showed 4.4 percent better average daily gain (2.46 vs. 2.26) and 6.2 percent improved feed efficiency (8.24 vs. 8.78) than cattle fed monensin.

To maximize production and keep meat and dairy prices competitive for consumers, producers routinely seek ways to improve the amount of weight cattle gain produced from each pound of feed. The faster animals get to market or breeding weight, the lower their cost of production and the lower price consumers pay at the supermarket.
In a perfect world, meeting this challenge would mean providing optimum nutrition and taking measures to ensure good intestinal health — and those inputs are important.
But invariably, cattle succumb to respiratory and enteric infections, which can hamper feed intake and greatly reduce weight gain. Antibiotics are often needed — not only to ensure the good health and welfare of the animal, but also to keep animals growing efficiently.
In-feed antibiotics are particularly helpful because they can selectively kill the bad bacteria while leaving good bacteria in place. For example, the anticoccidial Bovatec®(lasalocid) works in the rumen microflora to improve intestinal health and allow animals to utilize the energy of feedstuffs more efficiently. That in turn produces a healthier animal, one that can respond better to antibiotics such as Aureomycin® (chlortetracycline). The US Food and Drug Administration recently ruled that that these feed additives could be used together to optimize disease control and feed efficiency/gain.
In a ranch-to-rail study at Texas A&M University , disease also reduced the number of carcasses grading choice by 12 percent and increased the number of standard grading carcasses by 5 percent.
“When death loss, medicine costs, and reduced carcass value were considered, cattle that were identified and treated for sickness returned an average of around $88 less compared to cattle that were never treated for sickness,” investigators reported.
For more information about improving feed efficiency/gain, click on the links below.
© Copyright 2006 - 2007 Alpharma Inc. all rights reserved
Home | About Us | Cattle News Room | Industry Links | Need Help? | Health Tools | Health Topics | Contact Us | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Trademarks